I've been finding more and more reasons to use Scala instead of Java, but migrating a large existing project (e.g. at work) is hard and takes time. So I've been looking into ways to use more and more Scala-type-thinking in Java. Specifically preferring immutability for simplicity sake (it's not just for multithreading any more).
Here's a quick test-run of creating an immutable map the way I would in Scala, but doing it in Java. I had to use 6 initial elements to make this fair because the Guava Map has a 5-element constructor (Scala has a 4-element constructor). It amuses me that the plain Java solution, the one this is most deeply rooted in imperative programming, is the only one to explicitly rely on a lexical closure to ensure immutability of the underlying elements in the map.
// Scala
val OP_MAP = Map(("+", "Plus"),
("-", "Minus"),
("*", "Times"),
("/", "Divided By"),
("%", "Modulo"),
("^", "To the power of"))
// Google Guava
private static final ImmutableMap<String,String> OP_MAP =
new ImmutableMap.Builder<String,String>()
.put("+", "Plus"),
.put("-", "Minus"),
.put("*", "Times"),
.put("/", "Divided By"),
.put("%", "Modulo"),
.put("^", "To the power of")
.build();
// Java
private static final Map<String,String> OP_MAP;
static {
Map<String,String> m = new HashMap<>();
m.put("+", "Plus");
m.put("-", "Minus");
m.put("*", "Times");
m.put("/", "Divided By");
m.put("%", "Modulo");
m.put("^", "To the power of");
OP_MAP = Collections.unmodifiableMap(m);
}
// Scala collections from Java (based on decompiling the above Scala example)
@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
private static final WrappedArray<Tuple2<String,String>> wa =
Predef.wrapRefArray(
(Tuple2<String,String>[]) new Tuple2[] {
new Tuple2<>("+", "Plus"),
new Tuple2<>("-", "Minus"),
new Tuple2<>("*", "Times"),
new Tuple2<>("/", "Divided By"),
new Tuple2<>("%", "Modulo"),
new Tuple2<>("^", "To the power of") });
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static final scala.collection.immutable.Map<String,String> OP_MAP =
(scala.collection.immutable.Map<String,String>)
scala.Predef$.MODULE$.Map().apply(wa);
Conclusions
Wow. Using Scala from Java can get ugly! Of course, if I was willing to use a mutable Map, the Scala conversion would be simple and painless. But immutability was my goal.
Guava's Builder makes it slightly more elegant than the plain Java solution. But I often found it useful to have a collection that is the same as another with just one additional element. Unfortunately, there is no put() method on Map that returns a new immutable Map. No union(), intersect(), or difference() set operations. There is no forEach(), flatmap(), foldL(), foldR(), map() or other iterator.
While Guava is the winner at solving this particular problem, it's only a baby-step forward from the straight Java solution. I see that a lot of thought was put into the copyOf() method of Guava collections, but I'd much prefer internal iterators etc. that work together as an immutable API as described above. Let me know what I'm missing in the comments.
Sadly, Java 8 seems to only reinforce the assumption of mutability in their new interfaces. All the new iterators modify the underlying collection instead of returning a shallowly modified copy the way the Scala collections do. I'll probably be sticking with the straight-forward Java solution until I make the move to Scala. I might be tempted to wrap some Scala collections in Java-friendly classes that do all of the above that I mentioned, but of course, that's work...
Thanks to the folks on Stack Overflow for their invaluable help decompiling the Scala code!
No comments:
Post a Comment